Case Report

 

Histopathology of the Organs from Cattle with Leptospirosis

 

Yos Adi Prakoso1*, Sitarina Widyarini2, Kurniasih Kurniasih2

1Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia, 60225; 2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281.

 

Received | October 07, 2019; Accepted | February 17, 2020; Published | September 05, 2020

*Correspondence | Yos Adi Prakoso, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia, 60225; Email: yos.vet.docter@gmail.com

Citation | Prakoso YA, Widyarini S, Kurniasih K (2020). Histopathology of the organs from cattle with leptospirosis. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 8(11): 1220-1224.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.11.1220.1224

ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331

Copyright © 2020 Prakoso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

Leptospirosis is one of the neglected diseases distributed worldwide. Leptospirosis is caused by the bacteria from a genus of Leptospira sp. Leptospira sp. has been reported as a zoonotic bacteria that can be transmitted from animal to human or vice versa. Moreover, leptospirosis does not only occur in the rural but also in the urban area. It because rodents act as the primary reservoir of this disease (Boey et al., 2019). Rodent spread the bacteria through the urine to the environment. The presence of the bacteria in the environment promotes direct and indirect exposure that leads to an infection to humans with various clinical manifestations (Goarant, 2016). 

 

Leptospirosis can cause systemic infection as acute and chronic types in cattle (Zarantonelli et al., 2018). The pathogenic impact of leptospirosis in cattle is severe repro

 

 

ductive disorders, abortion (Favero et al., 2017), stillbirth, and weak off-spring (Suwancharoen et al., 2016). Further, it promotes the economic losses in the livestock industry. In this case, we reported the untypical histopathology and immunohistochemistry of several organs from the cattle with leptospirosis.  

 

Case presentation

 

Anamnesis and Necropsy

Four male cattle were found dead in the local cowshed, sub-district Krembung, East Java, on July 2019 – April 2020. Further, the disinfection was conducted in the cowshed area, and the necropsy was performed. Various gross lesions were found from the dead cattle. The details of the case history of the dead cattle were embedded in Table 1. 

 

Table 1: Case history of dead cattle with leptospirosis

 

Case code	Breed	Sex, age	Obit	Clinical signs	Gross lesions
C1	Bali cattle	M, 2 y	18 July 2019	Anorexia Hematuria	Redness in lung Adhesion of renal capsule
C2	Limousine	M, 3 y	26 July 2019	Hematuria	Redness in lung Liver enlargement Paleness of kidney
C3	Bali cattle	M, 2 y	8 August 2019	No clinical signs	Paleness of kidney
C4	Cross breed	M, 2 y 5 m	1 April 2020	No clinical signs	Redness in lung Adhesion of renal capsule Asymmetric size of kidney

M = male, y = year, m = month.

 

Table 2: Histopathology scoring system

 

Score	H&E				Gram and IHC
	Severity	Duration	Distribution	Exudate
0	NHC	NHC	NHC	NHC	NI
1	Minimal	Acute	Focal	Suppurative	Minimal
2	Mild	Chronic	Multifocal	Fibrinous	Mild
3	Moderate	Chronic active	Locally extensive	Necrotizing	Moderate
4	Severe	-	Diffuse	Fibrinopurulent	Severe
5	-	-	-	Granulomatous	-

NHC = no histopathological changes, NI = not identified, - = not categorized.

 

Samples Collection

The lung, liver, and kidney were collected and separated into two parts. The first part was stored inside the sterile plastic bag and cooled at 4° C. The second part was stored using 10% neutral buffer formalin (NBF). The specimens were transported to the Integrated Laboratory, University of Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia. 

 

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA)

The fresh specimens were tested using ELISA against Leptospira IgG (LEBTOSPIRA IgG ELISA kit, Cat. No: MBS036135, MyBioSource). Before the ELISA, the organs were mashed up using the mortar and mixed with sterile distilled water. The mixture was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes, and it repeated three times. The ELISA was performed following the provided procedure by the manufacturer. The optical density (OD) was read using an ELISA reader at 450 nm of wavelength. The samples were categorized as positive (OD ≥ 1.1) and negative (OD ≤ 1.0).

 

Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

The fixed specimens were processed for histopathology using several staining, including hematoxylin (Harris Hematoxylin Nuclear Stain, Cat. No: 3801560, Leica) and eosin (Eosin Secondary Counter Stains, Cat. No: 3801600, Leica) staining, Gram (Remel Gram stain kit, Cat. No: R40080, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and immunohistochemistry against CD4+ (RTU-CD4-1F6, Cat. No: PA0427, Leica), and CD8+ (RTU-CD8-295, Cat. No: PA0183, Leica). The H&E was used as routine staining, Gram used to stain bacteria, and IHC used to express the immunoreactivity of CD4+ and CD8+. The H&E and IHC staining were conducted following the procedure provided by manufacturer. However, the Gram staining was performed following the previous study (Becerra et al., 2016).

 

Morphometry

The H&E slide was analyzed by a single pathologist using the scoring system. The score was calculated based on the addition of scores from several parameters include severity, duration, distribution, and types of exudation. The Gram and IHC staining slide was scored based on the distribution of the staining target (Table 2).

 

Results and Discussion

 

The result showed that all the kidney specimens were positive against Leptospira IgG (Table 3). The kidney samples were tested against Leptospira IgG because these are the predilection of the Leptospira sp.  The appearance of IgG from the kidneys indicated that all cattle infected by Leptospira sp. Further laboratory tests revealed various histopathological changes of the lung, liver, and kidney. 

 

Table 3: ELISA of Leptospira IgG of kidney from dead cattle with leptospirosis

 

Organ	Case code
	C1	C2	C3	C4
Kidney	+	+	+	+

 

Table 4: Histopathology of lung, liver and kidney from dead cattle with leptospirosis

 

Organ	Parameter	Case code
		C1	C2	C3	C4
Lung	H&E score	10	3	2	13
	Gram score	0	0	0	0
	CD4+ score	2	1	3	2
	CD8+ score	1	1	2	4
	Morphologic diagnosis	Severe chronic diffuse pneumonia	Minimal acute focal pneumonia	Pulmonary congestion	Severe chronic active diffuse fibrinous pleuro-pneumonia
Liver	H&E score	0	4	0	3
	Gram score	0	0	0	0
	CD4+ score	0	0	1	0
	CD8+ score	0	2	0	0
	Morphologic diagnosis	NHC	Congestion, Fatty liver degeneration	NHC	Liver congestion
Kidney	H&E score	10	7	5	14
	Gram score	4	2	3	4
	CD4+ score	0	0	0	0
	CD8+ score	4	4	4	3
	Morphologic diagnosis	Severe chronic diffuse interstitial nephritis	Moderate chronic multifocal glomerulo-nephritis	Mild chronic focal interstitial nephritis	Severe chronic active diffuse necrotizing glomerulo-nephritis

NT = not tested, + = positive, - = negative, NHC = no histopathological changes.

 

 

The H&E score showed the severity of histopathology. A higher score indicated increasingly severe histopathological changes (Table 4). The lung showed pneumonia with various manifestations that belong to acute (C2), chronic (C1), and chronic active (C4). It was suspected that tissue destruction of the lung in C1, C2, and C4 reflected grad

 

 

ual pathogenesis in leptospirosis (Figures 1 and 2). However, the liver did not show significant histopathological changes (Figure 3). Further, the kidney from C1 and C3 showed chronic interstitial nephritis with diffuse and focal distribution, respectively. Besides, the C2 and C4 showed chronic glomerulonephritis (Table 4, Figure 4, and 5). 

 

 

 

 

Gram staining of lung and liver did not show the presence of slender form bacteria that may belong to Leptospira sp. In contrast, the kidney showed a high presentation of slender form bacteria within the lumen (Table 4 and Figure 6). Surprisingly, it is synergistic to the immunohistochemistry score. The zero scores of Gram staining in the lung showed the appearance of CD4+ and CD8+ as normal lymphocytes within the nodular lymphoid tissue. It was different from the kidney samples. The kidney showed a high expression of CD8+ as the compensatory impacts of Leptospira sp infection (Table 4). 

 

 

Leptospira sp. is a pathogenic bacteria that can survive in the environment for prolonged periods. The ability of Leptospira sp. to survive in the environment enables this bacteria to cause direct and indirect infection in humans and animals. Leptospirosis commonly occurs and spreads in the unsanitary area with a high population of rats. Wild rats act as the main reservoirs of Leptospira sp. that promote freshwater contamination through its urine (Pellizzaro et al., 2019). Furthermore, it enables the waterborne disease in cattle. 

 

Leptospira sp. is utilizing its virulence factors such as surface protein TlyC to bind the extracellular matrix of host tissue and erythrocytes (Evangelista and Coburn, 2010). In advances, this bacteria circulates through the bloodstream and releases sphingomyelinase C gene A (sphA) that induces endothelial and membrane cell damage (Narayanavari et al., 2015). In a healthy immunological response, the host body releases T-lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+) to eliminate the circulatory antigen. However, both CD4+ and CD8+ are suppressed during leptospirosis because leptospirosis can depress innate immune response associated with a decrease in NK cell, and adaptive immune response associated with an inhibition of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes (Duarte-Neto et al., 2019). 

 

The synergic mechanism between Leptospira virulence factors and its ability to inhibit immune response generates severe multisystem infection, including hepatic dysfunction, pulmonary lesion, and renal failure (De Brito et al., 2018). All those histopathological changes are similar to this study. The chronic pathogenesis of cattle leptospirosis in this study may be due to the presence of circulatory IgG. However, the IgG protection status in this study cannot be concluded because it only used qualitative ELISA.

 

Significantly, this study demonstrated that modified tissue Gram staining could be used as a diagnostic tool to stain the presence of slender form bacteria that may belong to Leptospira sp. In this study, Leptospira sp. stained purple that similar to the Gram-positive bacteria because it has a surface membrane that shares a feature of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as the murein cell wall and lipopolysaccharides, respectively (Ko et al., 2009). Unfortunately, this study only used qualitative ELISA as a comparison against Gram staining. Further study is necessary to be performed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of Gram staining between the existence of Leptospira sp. within the tissue using a more considerable number of specimens and a more sophisticated laboratory test. 

 

Conclusions

 

This study demonstrated that leptospirosis in cattle impacts on the lung, liver, and kidney with various manifestations. The significance of this study is that we found the modified Gram staining could be used to stain the slender form bacteria that may belong to Leptospira sp. even though further exploration must be conducted. 

 

Acknowledgment

 

All staff from Integrated Laboratory, UMSIDA, East Java, Indonesia were acknowledged for their assistance during the processing of the collected specimens.

 

Author’s contribution

 

All the authors contributed equally during this study and approved the final version of the manuscript.

 

Conflict of interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

 

References

 

• Becerra SC, Roy DC, Sanchez CJ, Christy RJ, Burmeister DM (2016). An optimized staining technique for the detection of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria within tissue. BMC. Res. Notes. 9: 216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1902-0.

• Boey K, Shiokawa K, Rajeev S (2019). Leptospira infection in rats: a literature review of global prevalence and distribution. PLoS. Negl. Trop. Dis. 13(8): e0007499. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0007499.

• De Brito T, Silva A, Abreu P (2018). Pathology and pathogenesis of human leptospirosis: a commented review. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Poulo. 60: e23. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-9946201860023.

• Duarte-Neto AN, Croda J, Pagliari C, Soriano FG, Nicodemo AC, Duarte MIS (2019). Severe leptospirosis features in the spleen indicate cellular immunosuppression similar to that found in septic shock. Front. Immunol. 10: 920. http://dx.doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00920.

• Evangelista KV, Coburn J (2010). Leptospira as an emerging pathogen: a review of its biology, pathogenesis and host immune responses. Future. Microbiol. 5(9): 1413‐1425. http://doi:10.2217/fmb.10.102.

• Favero JF, de Araujo HL, Lilenbaum W, Machado G, Tonin AA, Baldissera MD (2017). Bovine leptospirosis: prevalence, associated risk factors for infection and their cause-effect relation. Microb. Pathog. 107: 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.03.032.

• Goarant C (2016). Leptospirosis: risk factors and management challenges in diveloping countries. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 7: 49-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FRRTM.S102543.

• Ko A, Goarant C, Piccardeau M (2009). Leptospira: the dawn of molecular genetics era for an emerging zoonotic pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7: 736–746. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fnrmicro2208.

• Narayanavari SA, Lourdault K, Sritharan M, Haake DA, Matsunaga J (2015). Role of sph2 gene regulation in hemolytic and sphingomyelinase activities produced by Leptospira interrogans. PLoS. Negl. Trop. Dis. 9(8): e0003952. http://doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003952.

• Pellizzaro M, Martins CM, Yamakawa AC, Ferraz DC, Morikawa VM, Ferreira F, Dos Santos AP, Biondo AW, Langoni H (2019). Molecular detection of Leptospira spp. in rats as early spatial predictor for human disease in an endemic urban area. PLoS. One. 14(5): e0216830. http://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216830.

• Suwancharoen D, Limlertvatee S, Chetiyawan P, Tongpan P, Sangkaew N, Sawaddee Y, Inthakan K, Wiratsudakul A. (2016). A nationwide survey of pathogenic leptospires in urine of cattle and buffaloes by Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method in Thailand, 2011–2013. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 78(9): 1495-1500. https://dx.doi.org/10.1292%2Fjvms.15-0493.

• Zarantonelli L, Suanes A, Meny P, Buroni F, Nieves C, Salaberry X, Briano C, Ashfield N, Silveira CDS, Dutra F, Easton C, Fraga M, Giannitti F, Hamond C, Macías-Rioseco M, Menéndez C, Mortola A, Picardeau M, Quintero J, Ríos C, Rodríguez V, Romero A, Varela G, Rivero R, Schelotto F, Riet-Correa F, Buschiazzo A. (2018). Isolation of pathogenic Leptospira strains from naturally infected cattle in Uruguay reveals high serovar diversity, and uncovers a relevant risk for human leptospirosis. PLoS. Negl. Trop. Dis. 12(9): e0006694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006694.