Research Article

 

Protective Effect of Cholestyramine and Oxihumate on Experimentally Induced -Ochratoxicosis in Broiler Chickens

 

Abdel Moneim A. Ali1, Mahmoud F. Fahmy1, Mohamed M. Metwally1, Hend A. Azazy2, Rehab E. Mowafy2*

1Pathology Dep. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Zagazig University; 2Animal Health Research Institute (ACR), Dokki, Gizza, Egypt.

 

Received | July 21, 2021; Accepted | August 08, 2021; Published | August 25, 2021

*Correspondence | Rehab E Mowafy, Animal Health Research Institute (ACR), Dokki, Gizza, Egypt; Email: mowafyrehab@yahoo.com

Citation | Ali AMA, Fahmy MF, Metwally MM, Azazy HA, Mowafy RE (2021). Protective effect of cholestyramine and oxihumate on experimentally induced -ochratoxicosis in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Health Prod. 9(s1): 62-68.

DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2021/9.s1.62.68

ISSN | 2308-2801

Copyright © 2021 Mowafy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Introduction

 

Mycotoxins are metabolites of filamentous fungi and have strong economically negative impact on livestock, poultry and humans (Ropejko and Twarużek, 2019). The disease evolved from mycotoxin-contaminated animal feed, as a global issue, ranged from acute disease outbreaks to severe metabolic disorders (Bryden, 2012; Murugesan et al., 2015). The mycotoxins in the worldwide also have health risks that vary from allergic reactions to deaths on animals and humans (Haque et al., 2020).

 

Ochratoxin-A (OTA) is one of the mycotoxins most commonly isolated from the environment. It is regularly detected in cereals, coffee, cocoa, wine, beer, spices and milk, but also occurs in the other foodstuffs. Accordingly, OTA is also found in human body fluids like urine, breast milk and blood. This occurrence was associated with increased level of OTA exposure (Ropejko and Twarużek, 2019). OTA is considered as a powerful avian nephrotoxin, although the mode of action of ochratoxin is not yet understood and appears to be very complicated (Pfohl-Leszkowicz et al., 2007). Protein inhibition, NDA adduct constituent, induction of oxidative stress in addition to necrosis /apoptosis and cell cycle arrest play role in its toxicity (Tamas and Miklós, 2016). OTA induces enlarged, pale kidneys, degenerative, necrotic, and inflammatory changes subsequently impairing its function in addition to it causes hepatic lesion, lymphoid atrophy together with depletion of lymphocytes (Stoev et al., 2004; Koynarski et al., 2007; Patial et al., 2013) . 

 

Cholestyramine (CH) is an effective binder for OTA in vitro although it has been used primarly as bile acids adsorbent in the gut to reduce cholesterol (Avantaggiato et al., 2005). The treatment of the intoxicated chicks with cholestyramine in the drinking water showed partially and temporarily improvement in the relative weights and the histopathological lesion scores of the tested immune organs (spleen and bursa of Fabricius) (Abdelnaser et al., 2017).

Oxihumates are the salts of humic acid in which the exchange site is Ca+ , Na+ , Al+ and Fe+2 rather than hydrogen. Humic substance able to inhibit bacterial and fungal growth, thus decreasing levels of mycotoxins in feed (van Rensburg et al., 2006). Its beneficial effects include stress management, anti-inflammatory activity, antiviral properties, and prevention of intestinal diseases, mainly diarrhea in both humans and animals. As well, it improves the health status through working against pathogens, developing immunity and improved growth of broilers by increasing the digestion of protein and improved trace element utilization. It has been believed that the oxihumates have a high adsorbent capacity for several mycotoxins such as OTA (Jansen-van, 2005). The objective of this study was therefore to compare the protective effect of both cholestyramine and oxihumate for OTA toxicity in broiler chickens.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 

Preparation of ochratoxin-A (OTA)

Prepared Aspergillus ochraceus strain was obtained from the Central Laboratory of Residues of Agricultural Product, Agriculture Pesticides Residues Centre, Dokki, Egypt. Aspergillus ochraceus was grown on malt peptone (MP) broth using 10% (v/v) of malt extract (Brix 10) and 0.1 % (w/v) bacto peptone (Difco) in 2 mL of medium in 15 mL tubes. The cultures were incubated at 25°C for 7-days in light/darkness. The OTA extract was analyzed by (HPLC) (Samson et al., 2004). The media was sprayed on diet to obtain OTA (100 ppb).

 

Experimental grouping

Sixty-four, one-day-old, Cubb breed unsexed chicks were purchased from Alkahira Company (Cairo, Egypt) and kept under standard hygienic conditions in separate floor pens (1.5m x 2m each) in open sided house. Starter diets contain 22.03-22.26% crude protein with 2970.46-2978.11 Kcal ME, while finisher diets contains 18.39%-18.59% crude protein and 3176.70 Kcal ME. Starter diets were offered from 1-18 day and finisher diets were offered from 19-36 day of age. Both feed and water were offered ad-libitum. All diets were formulated to cover the nutrient requirements (NRC, 1994). All the experimental procedures were performed at Animal Health Research Institute (Zagazig Provincial Laboratory) in accordance with the recommendations and guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (ZU-IACUC) of Zagazig University.

 

Chicks were divided randomly into 4-groups (n=16 each) ); group-1(basal diet + ochratoxin-A), group-2 (basal diet + ochratoxin-A + cholestyramine), group-3 (basal diet + ochratoxin-A + oxihumate), and group-4 (basal diet). The chemical detoxifying agent cholestyramine (Questran ®, Bristol- Myers Squibb) was used in a dose of 170 µg/ mg mycotoxin in the ration (17 µg/ kg ration) (Solfrizzo et al., 2001). Humic acid Oxihumate (El-Nasr pharmaceutical Chemical Company, Egypt) as a physical detoxifying agent was used in a dose of 3.5 gm/kg ration (Jansen-van, 2005).

 

During 36 days experiment peroid, the mortalities were recorded. At the end of the experiment, the clinical signs, mortalities and post-mortem lesions of dead and sacrificed chickens were recorded with sample harvesting for further investigations.

 

Pathological investigation

From each group, the speciemens of kidney, liver, spleen, bursa of Fabricius and intestine were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The paraffin sections of 5-µm thickness were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin staining (Survarna et al., 2013), then microscopically examined.

 

Residual investigation

Residues of OTA were determined in liver, kidney and muscle tissues at the end of the experiment in the ochratoxicated groups by using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC; Prominence TM, Shimadzu® Tokyo, Japan). Twenty grams aliquot of fresh chicken tissues samples were homogenized and prepared (Matrella et al., 2006). Extracted samples were passed through the immune affinity via clean-up of 1-2 drops as per previously reported method (Beg et al., 2006).

 

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS software using one-way ANOVA to determine the statistical significance of differences among groups. Duncan’s test was used for testing the inter-grouping homogeneity.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

Chickens of OTA intoxicated group-1 were suffered from weakness, restlessness and increased water consumption.

 

Table 1: Experimental groups, treatments and mortalities during the whole experiment.

 

Treatments/ Groups	Ochratoxin A 100ppb	Cholestyramine 170 µg / mg mycotoxin	Oxihumate 3.5 g/kg ration	Mortalities (%)
Group(1)	+	-	-	31.25%.
Group(2)	+	+	-	18.75%.
Group(3)	+	-	+	18.75%.
Group(4)	-	-	-	-

 

Diarrhoea with high urate contents, poorly feathering and paleness of both comb and wattles were also observed in some cases. Table-1 showed the mortality rate of all groups. The cumulative mortality rate of group-1 was 31.25% (5 birds/group). The aforementioned clinical findings were consistent and in agreement with those reported by (Resanovie et al., 2009; Zahoor et al., 2011; Nedeljković et al., 2015; Gaheen, 2017). In addition, it is worth to mention here, the recorded paleness of the comb and wattles could be explained via the impaired utilization of dietary carotenoids caused by OTA intoxication. In addition, OTA decreased serum iron, total iron-binding capacity and transferrin percent, therefore it induces iron deficiency anaemia which considered the most common type of hypochromic microcytic anaemia Malir et al. (2016). The other signs could be attributed to the toxic immunosuppressive effect of OTA which acting as stress factor (Al-Anati and Petzinger, 2006). Furthermore, the renal toxic effect of OTA (Elaroussi et al., 2006), led to the whitish watery diarrhea that subsequently induced relatively high mortality rate (31.25%). In earlier studies, intoxication with OTA caused moderate mortality rate i.e., 20% (Gahen, 2017) however may reach up to 35.7% (Kumar et al., 2004). In group-2 and -3, no remarkable clinical signs could be observed among the majority of chickens during the whole experimental period. However, a few experimental birds of those two groups showed mild depression and diarrhea with some mortalities of 18.75% (3 birds/group). Reduction of both clinical signs and mortalities in both treated group-2 and -3 may attributed to the ameliorative effect of the either applied antimycotoxin, cholestyramine or oxihumate, respectively. Cholestyramine reduces the plasma level of ochratoxin and enhances the fecal excretion of OTA (Kerkadi et al., 1998). Oxihumate has high adsorptive properties that hinder the gastrointestinal mycotoxin absorption (Jansen-van, 2005).

 

The kidneys are considered as the key target organ of OTA toxicity (Ringot et al., 2006). Necropsy revealed marked kidney injuries of chickens of group-1 such as severe kidneys paleness and enlargement with urate deposition (Vencislav et al., 2007; Bozoo et al., 2008; Hameed et al., 2013; Abo El-Fetouh et al., 2016). Furthermore, variable gross findings were noticed such as enlargement of the examined liver with yellowish discoloration. The enlargement of the liver and kidney in the instance of OTA intoxication might be due to the fact that these organs considered the major role in detoxification and elimination of OTA level. OTA is known to have direct toxic action (Stoev et al., 2000) as well as high level of its accumulation in these organs (Biro et al., 2002). Hyperaemic mucosal surface of intestine was also noticed in some cases. Some chicken showed thickening of intestinal wall with excessive mucous contents. Atrophy of lymphoid organs was also detected, hence the bursal lesions were similar to that obtained by El-Aroussi et al. (2006) and Hameed et al. (2013). The Latter studies stated that the depletion of the lymphoid elements of birds bursa and spleen due to the toxic effect of OTA lead to various immunosuppressive effects. Thickening of intestinal mucosa could be attributed to the direct contact of OTA particles to intestinal mucosa (Kabak et al., 2009). Addition of cholestyramine or oxihumate to OTA contaminated diet led milder lesions than that of group-1, represented by only slight enlargement and mild congestion of both kidneys and liver, while other organs were grossly normal. Reduction of gross lesions in both group-2 and -3 compared with those of group-1 could be attributed to the protective effect of both cholestyramine or oxihumate on different organs of ochratoxicated chickens (Jansen-van, 2005).

 

Kidneys of group-1 showed degeneration or necrosis of renal tubules with replacement by extravasated RBCS beside focal leukocytic cells infiltration (Fig. 1a). Some renal tubules contained urates deposites within its lumen (Fig. 1b). Focal intertubular lymphocytic cells infiltration and interstitial fibrosis were encountered. Other renal tubules revealed massive heterophils and lymphocytes infiltration while kidneys of group-2 showed mild tubular degeneration and mild to moderate congestion of the renal tubules (Fig. 1c). Nephrotic changes in some renal tubules (Fig. 1d) were also detected in the same group in addition to a few extravasated erythrocytes among dissociated renal tubule (Fig. 1e). Kidneys of group-3 showed dilatation of some renal tubules containing casts (Fig. 1f) in some cases and others showed regeneration of some renal tubules (Fig. 1g). Marked hepatic lesions in chickens of group-1 were also observed which represented by portal fibrosis and cholestasis (Fig. 2a), in addition to mild to moderate congestion of hepatic blood vessels in some cases while. Liver of chickens in group-2 showed only moderate congestion of the hepatic blood vessels (Fig. 2b). In group-3, livers

 

 

 

 

showed mild perivascular lymphocytic cells infiltration (Fig. 2c). The previous renal and hepatic lesions of group-1 were almost agreed with those obtained by (Hameed et al., 2013; Bharathi et al., 2015). The observed renal lesions may be due to the route of elimination of OTA through the kidneys and to the direct toxic action of OTA on renal parenchyma (Stoev et al., 2002). OTA inhibits protein synthesis, produces acute proximal tubular epithelial necrosis in the kidneys and inhibits normal renal uric acid secretion. The increased levels of serum uric acid and creatinine in the OTA intoxicated chickens which represented by urate deposition indicative of impaired renal function and confirms that kidney are main site of OTA toxicity (Elaroussi et al., 2008). Spleen in most cases of chicken of group-1 revealed mild to severe lymphoid depletion and splitting of splenic capsule (Fig. 2d), while spleen of group-2 showed subcapsular edema and mild depletion (Fig. 2e). Spleen of group-3 showed congestion of blood vessels with hyperplastic white pulps (Fig. 2f). Spleen lesions were almost similar to that obtained by (Stoev et al., 2004; Bharathi et al., 2015) OTA has immunotoxic properties due to its degenerative changes and cell death of immune cells because of inhibition of protein synthesis (AL-Anati and Petzinger,

 

Table 2: Ochratoxin-A residues in different organs of the experimental groups (mean ± SD)

Organ /Groups	Liver	Kidney	Muscle
1	226.93±3.21a	214.59±3.28a	391.41±2.89a
2	73.02±2.54b	89.91±2.71c	137.25±2.24c
3	82.42±24.95b	102.72±3.141b	145.82±2.39b

Superscripts within the same column are significantly different (P ˂0.05), based on Duncan̕s multiple comparison.

 

Table 3: Lesions score among different examined organs of experimental groups

Affected organ of experimental chickens	Main lesions	Lesion score in different groups (gr-1, gr-2 and gr-3)
		1	2	3
Kidney	Hemorrhage- Degenerative changes- Coagulative necrosis- Regenerative attempts- -Urate deposition Perivascular fibrosis-	+ + + ++ + + + + + +	+ + + + - -	++ + + + - -
Liver	Coagulative necrosis- Portal fibrosis- Portal leukocytic infiltrations- Cholestasis- -Kupffer cell proliferation	+++ ++ + ++ ++ +	+ + + + + +	++ ++ ++ + + +
Spleen	Lymphocytic depletion- Splitting of capsule- Perivascular edema-	+ + + + + +	+ + +	+ + +
Bursa of Fabricius	Lymphoid depletion of lymphoid follicle- Hemorrhage- Hyperplastic lymphoid follicle degeneration- Interstitial fibrosis- Hyperplasia of epithelial covering	++ + ++ + ++	+ -- - - +	+ - + - +
Intestine	Submucosal leukocytic infiltration- Congestion of intestinal blood vessels- Intestinal thickenin Hyperplastic intestinal glands Enterocytes desqumation and necrosis -	++ ++ ++ + ++	- - + ++ +	- + + ++ +

(-): negative; (+): mild; (++): moderate; (+++): severe

 

2006). Bursa of Fabricius of group-1 chickens showed mild depletion of lymphocytes with interfollicular fibroplasia and focal haemorrhage (Fig. 3a), while in group-2 revealed apparently normal lymphoid follicles (Fig. 3b), and mild interfollicular edema in group-3 (Fig. 3c). Bursa of Fabricius lesions nearly agreed with those obtained by Santin et al. (2002) and Bharathi et al. (2015). Bursal lymphoid depletion occurred reflects reduction in antibody producing cells and reduction of bursal mitotic index leading to immunosuppression (Santin et al., 2002). Intestine of goup-1 chickens revealed degenerated submucosal glands and fusion of villous tips (Fig. 3d) while intestine of group-2 chickens showed hyperplastic intestinal glands in submucosa (Fig. 3e) and intestine of group-3 showed hyaline degeneration of muscular layer and proliferative submucosal glands (Fig. 3f) In accordance, the intestinal lesions could be explained on a base of direct contact of intestinal mucosa to OTA particles (Bharathi et al., 2015). The severity of this lesion was dose and time dependent which was supported by El-Banna, (2003) who noticed catarrhal enteritis. Reduced lesions in group-3 was attributed to the effect of oxihumate on OTA toxicated chickens according to Jansen-van (2005) who stated that oxihumate had a high adsorbent capacity for OTA. Table-2 shows the residues of OTA in collected organs. The lesion scores of different examined organs of experimental groups were demonstrated in a Table 3. These results are in agreement with a recent study who exhibited a significant reduction in lesion score and aflatoxin residue in visceral organs by using antimycotoxin binders cholestyramine and oxihumate (Ali et al., 2020). Likewise another study reported the significant potential of humic acid against aflatoxicosis in broilers (Arafat and Khan, 2017).

 

CONCLUSION

 

Addition of cholestyramine and oxihumates as antimycotoxins into chicken ration had significant protective effect against OTA with superiority of cholestyramine when compared with oxihumates.

 

acknowledgements

 

The authors thank their respected institutes and university.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 

The authors declare that there is no any conflict of interest.

 

authors contribution

 

All authors except the forth one had supervision contribution .The first and fifth author had the major contributing part in paper writing, editing and reviewing in addition the role of the third, forth and fifth author in practical part implementation and finally corresponding by the fifth author.

 

REFERENCES

 

• Abdelnaser AHT, El Nabarawy AM, Zyan KA, El Basuni SS (2017). Efficacy of different antimycotoxicosis compounds on the main immune organs and humoral immune response of broiler chickens fed on aflatoxin and/or ochratoxin contaminated diet. BENHA. V.MED. J. 33 (2): 430-446. https://doi.org/10.21608/bvmj.2017.30591

• Abo El-Fetouh EH, Heba MA, Halla S (2016). Pathological and biochemical studies on ochratoxicosis in balady duckling with trail of treatment. BVM J. 31 (1): 159-166. https://doi.org/10.21608/bvmj.2016.31244

• Al-Anati L, Petzinger E (2006). Immunotoxic activity of ochratoxin A. J. Vet. Pharmacol. 29: 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2006.00718.x

• Ali AMA, Fahmy MF, Metwally MM, Hassanin O, Azazy HA, Mowafy RE (2020). Ameliorative Effects of Cholestyramine and Oxihumate on Aflatoxicosis in Broiler Chickens. Pak. Vet. J. http://dx.doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2020.093.

• Arafat RY, Khan SH (2017). Evaluation of humic acid as an aflatoxin binder in broiler chickens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 17, no. 1: 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0050

• Ashkenzi A, Yuan J , Wells JA (2014). Methods in enzymology book. 545.

• Avantaggiato G, Solfrizzo M, Visconti A (2005). Recent advances on the use of adsorbent materials for detoxification of Fusarium mycotoxins. Food. Add. Contam. A .22: 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030500058312

• Beg MU, Al-Mutairi M, Beng KR (2006). Mycotoxins in poultry feed in Kuwait. Arch. Environ. Contam.Toxicol. 50: 594-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-005-2094-0

• Bharathi R, Pazhanivel N, Balachandran C (2015). Pathological and immunological effects of sublethal experimental ochratoxicosis in broiler chickens. Ind. J. Vet. Pathol. 39 (1): 98-101. https://doi.org/10.5958/0973-970X.2015.00024.3

• Biró K, Solti L, Barna-Vetró I (2002). Tissue distribution of ochratoxin A as determined by HPLC and ELISA and histopathological effects in chickens. Avian. Pathol . 31 (2): 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450120118621

• Bozoo G, Ceci E, Bonerba E, (2008). Ochratoxin A in laying hens: High performance liquid chromatography detection and cytological and histological analysis of target tissues. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 17:151-156. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00058

• Bryden WL, (2012). Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: Implications for animal productivity and feed security. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 173:134-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.014

• Dwivedi P, Mir MS (2010). Ochratoxin A induced serum biochemical alterations. In Newzeland white rabbits. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 34 (6): 525-531.

• EFSA (2009). Review of mycotoxin-detoxifying agents used as feed additives: mode of action, efficacy and feed/ food safety. http://www.efsa. europa.eu /en/supporting/ pub/22e.htm.

• Elaroussi MA, Mohamed FR, El-Barkouky EM (2006). Experimental ochratoxicosis in broiler chicks .Avian. Pathol. 35 (4): 263- 269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450600817115

• Elaroussi MA, Mohamed FR, Elgendy MS (2008). Ochratoxicosis in broiler chicken: Functional and histological changes in target. Inter. J. Poult. Sci. 7: 414:422 https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.414.422.

• El-Banna HI R (2003). Some studies on the prevention and control of mycotoxicosis in chickens. Ph.D. Thesis (Poultry Disease), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University. Egypt.

• Gaheen SA (2017). Pathological studies on ochratoxicosis in poultry. M.V.Sc. Thesis (Pathology). Faculty of Veterinary Medicine. Zagazig University.

• Hameed MR, Khan MZ, Khan A (2013). Ochratoxin induced pathological alterations in broiler chicks. Effect of dose and duration. Pak.Vet J. 33 (2): 145-149.

• Harrison GD, Harrison LD (1986). Clinical Avian Medicine and Surgery. W.B. Saunders Company, London, Tokyo and hang Kong.

• Haque MA, Wang Y, Shen Z, et al., (2020). Mycotoxin contamination and control strategy in human, domestic animal and poultry: A Review. Microbial. Pathog. 142:104095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104095

• Jansen-van CR (2005). The ameliorating effect of oxihumate on aflatoxicosis in broilers. Ph.D. Thesis (Ani Wildlife Sci.). Fac. Nat. Agri. Sci. University of Pretoria.

• Kabak BI, Brandon EF, Var I (2009). Effects of probiotic bacteria on the bioaccessibility of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A using an in vitro digestion model under fed conditions. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 44 (5):472- 480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230902935154

• Kerkadi A, C Barriault, B Tuchweber (1998). Dietary cholestyramine reduces ochratoxin A-induced nephrotoxicity in the rat by decreasing plasma levels and enhancing fecal excretion of the toxin. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 3: 231 -250. https://doi.org/10.1080/009841098159367

• Koynarski V, Stoev S, Grozeva N (2007). Experimental coccidiosis provoked by Eimeria acervulina in chicks simultaneously fed on ochratoxin A contaminated diet. Res. Vet. Sci. 28 (2): 225-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.07.004

• Kumar A, Jindal N, Shukla CL (2004). Effect of ochratoxin A on Escherichia coli-challenged broiler chicks. Avian. Dis. 2: 47: 415. https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086(2003)047[0415:EOOAOE]2.0.CO;2

• Malir F, Ostry V, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A (2016) . Ochratoxin A: 50 Years of Research. Toxins. 8 (7): 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8070191

• Matrella RL, Monaci MA, Milillo F (2006). Ochratoxin A determination in paired kidneys and muscles from Swine slaughtered in Southern Italy. Food .Control. 17: 114-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.08.008

• Murugesan GR, Ledoux DR, Naehrer K, et al (2015). Prevalence and effects of mycotoxins on poultry health and performance, and recent development in mycotoxin counteracting strategies. Poult. Sci. 94:1298-315. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev075

• Nedeljković-Trailović J, Trailović S, Resanović R (2015). Comparative investigation of the efficacy of three different adsorbents against OTA-induced toxicity in broiler chickens. Toxins. 7(4): 1174-1191. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins7041174

• Novak G, Kozler J, Janos P (2001). Humic acids from coals of the North-Bohemian coal field I. Preparation and characterisation. React. Function. Polymers. 47: 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00076-6

• NRC (1994). National Research Council, Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th ed .National Academy press, Washington ,D.C.

• Patial V, Asrani RK, Patil RD, Ledoux DR , Rottinghaus GE (2013).Pathology of Ochratoxin A–Induced Nephrotoxicity in Japanese Quail and Its Protection by Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L. Avi. Dis. 57(4): 767-779. https://doi.org/10.1637/10549-040913-Reg.1

• Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, Tozlovanu M, Manderville R (2007). New molecular and field evidences for the implication of mycotoxins but not aristolochic acid in humen nephropathy and urinary tract tumor. Mol. Nutr. Food. Res. 51 (9): 1131-1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200700045

• Resanovie R, Kesnija Nm, Nesic V (2009). Mycotoxins in poultry production. Proc. Nat. Sci. Matica. Srpska. Novi. Sad: 7- 14. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSPN0916007R

• Ringot D, Chango A, Schneider Y (2006). Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of ochratoxin A, an update. Chem. Biol. Interact. 159:18–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.10.106

• Ropejko K, Twarużek M (2019) .The occurrence of ochratoxin A in human body fluids – review. Toxin Rev. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2019.1605530

• Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC (2004). Introduction to food borne fungi, 7th Ed. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures. Utrecht .

• Santin E, Paulillo AC, Maiorka PC (2002). The effects of ochratoxin / aluminosilicate interaction on the tissues and humoral immune response of broilers. Avi. Pathol. 31 (1):73-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450120106642

• Solfrizzo M, Visconti A, Avantaggiato G (2001). In vitro and in vivo studies to assess the effectiveness of cholestyramine as a binding agent for fumonisins. Mycopathologia. 151(3): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017999013702

• Stoev SD, Anguelov G, Ivanov I, Pavlo D (2000). Influence of ochratoxin A and an extract of artichoke on the vaccinal immunity and health in broiler chicks. Exp.Toxicol. Pathol. 52: 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-2993(00)80014-7

• Stoev SD, Koynarsky V, Mantle PG (2002). Clinicomorphological studies in chicks fed ochratoxin A while stimulataneously developing coccidiosis .Vet. Res. Commun. 26 (3):189-204. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015201604241

• Stoev SD, Stefanov M, Denev S, Radic B, Domijan AM , Peraica M (2004). Experimental mycotoxicosis in chickens induced by ochratoxin A and penicillic acid and intervention with natural plant extracts. Vet. Res. Comm. 28: 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VERC.0000045960.46678.d3

• Survarna SK, Layton C, Bancroft JD (2013). Bancroft’s. Theory and Pratice of Histological Techniques. 7th Ed., Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, England.

• Tamás K and Miklós P, (2016). Ochratoxin A: Molecular Interactions, Mechanisms of Toxicity and Prevention at the Molecular Level. Toxins 2016, 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8040111

• Van Rensburg CJ, Van Rensburg CEJ ,Van Ryssen JBJ (2006). In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of humic Acid as an Aflatoxin Binder in Broiler Chickens. Poult. Sci. 85(9):1576-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.9.1576

• Vencislav K, Stocho D, Stoev NG (2007). Experimental coccidiosis provide by Eimeria adenoeides in turkey poults given ochratoxin A. Vet. Archiv. 77(2):113-128.

• Zahoor UH, Khan MZ, Khan A (2011). Immunological status of progeny of hens kept on ochratoxin A (OTA) contaminated feed. J. Immunotoxicol. 8:122-130. https://doi.org/10.3109/1547691X.2010.547886