Journal of Animal Health and Production

Research Article
J. Anim. Health Prod. 8(1): 32-39
 
Figure 1

Boxplot demonstrating the median, minimum, maximum. 25th and 75th percentile values of body weight among different sex of South African indigenous goats. 

Figure 2

Heat map of phenotypic correlation of body weight and morphological traits of indigenous goats. (A) Correlation matrix of females (does); (B) Correlation matrix of males (bucks). Pearson correlation colour illustration, high correlation is red, mid correlation is white and low correlation is blue. BW: Body weight; WH: Withers height; RH: Rump height; BL: Body length; RL: Rump length; HG: Heart girth; ** Highly significant at p<0.01; * Significant at p<0.05; ns not significant. 

Figure 3

Effect of withers height on body weight. (A) Does and (B) Bucks. BW: Body weight; WH: Withers height; R2: Coefficient of determination. 

Figure 4

Effect of body length on body weight. (A) Does and (B) Bucks. BW: Body weight; BL: Body length; R2: Coefficient of determination. 

Figure 5

Effect of rump height on body weight. (A) Does and (B) Bucks. BW: Body weight; RH: Rump height; R2: Coefficient of determination. 

Figure 6

Effect of rump length on body weight. (A) Does and (B) Bucks. BW: Body weight; RL: Rump length; R2: Coefficient of determination. 

Figure 7

Effect of heart girth on body weight. (A) Does and (B) Bucks. BW: Body weight; HG: Heart girth; R2: Coefficient of determination.